before
after

In this interview, Ling Koay, Chief Marketing Officer at Arevo, shares how the company evolved from quiet research to a confident, bold brand rooted in science.
Can you introduce us to Arevo and share the story of its early development?
Arevo is a crop nutrition company founded with a clear mission: to reduce agriculture’s reliance on conventional mineral fertilisers. The company originated from academic research at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), where a professor began studying how plants actually take up nitrogen—the most critical nutrient for growth.
Modern agriculture depends heavily on mineral fertilisers, yet forestry operates differently. Trees grow without fertilisation, particularly in northern Sweden. This contrast raised a fundamental question: if forests thrive without fertilisers, what form of nitrogen are plants naturally using?
That question led to research into organic nitrogen uptake. The breakthrough was the discovery that plants can absorb nitrogen in the form of amino acids—specifically arginine, a naturally occurring nitrogen source found in soil and living organisms. Arginine became the foundation of Arevo’s technology.
Arginine strengthens plant development by increasing root hairs, which expand the root’s surface area and improve the plant’s ability to absorb water and nutrients. This creates stronger root systems and more resilient growth.

Image courtesy by Arevo
Over time, the research moved beyond forestry into agriculture. Arevo developed a product that combines arginine with phosphorus to create a stable, slow-release nutrient system. Unlike traditional nitrate-based fertilisers, which easily wash out of the soil, this formulation binds to the soil, keeping nutrients available to plants instead of leaching into waterways.
The product, Arginex, reflects Arevo’s core idea: grow more food with less input by reducing nutrient loss and environmental impact. While conventional fertilisers have played a crucial role in feeding the world, their inefficiency has led to overuse and pollution. Arevo’s approach focuses on improving how nutrients are delivered, not simply adding more of them.
The company was founded around ten years ago following this research. The scientific work was recognised with the Marcus Wallenberg Prize , the Oscars of agricultural science, which helped fund the company’s early development.
Since then, Arevo has evolved from a forestry-focused venture into a broader agricultural company. The founding researcher remains involved as CTO, while recent leadership changes reflect the company’s expansion into new crop segments beyond forestry.

Niklas Astrom CEO Arevo
As Arevo evolves, which values have remained constant—and which ones needed to evolve?
Environmental responsibility has always been a non-negotiable value for Arevo. Sustainability remains at the core of everything we do, and that hasn’t changed. What has evolved is how we want to be perceived in the market.
Through the rebrand, we identified five key shifts.
The first is differentiation. We don’t want to be seen as just another biostimulant in an increasingly crowded market. Anyone can claim a product works, but we want to be recognised as a scientifically proven new standard for crop nutrition. Our product is based on a new molecule that has been researched for over a decade, with clear evidence showing how it strengthens roots—making them deeper, longer, and more resilient from the very beginning of a plant’s life.
The second shift is about confidence. Historically, Arevo has been a very humble company—deeply capable, but quiet. Much of our team is based in northern Sweden, where communication tends to be minimal and precise. That humility has served us well scientifically, but in a global market it meant we weren’t cutting through the noise. Today, we want to show up as a bold and confident challenger, without losing the scientific ground.r

Image courtesy by Arevo
The third shift reflects our origins. We come from Nordic forestry, and our brand has long been associated with the forest. While forestry remains important, our products are now used across agriculture. We want to be seen not only as a forestry company, but as a global agricultural innovator and a serious player in multiple crop segments.
The fourth shift is about communication. Around 80% of our team comes from academic and scientific backgrounds. That depth of expertise is a strength, but science doesn’t always translate easily. In a market with thousands of competitors, we need to turn scientific complexity into a story that is clearer, more compelling, and more ownable.
The final shift responds to farmer scepticism. The market is crowded with products that promise results but fail to deliver, and farmers are understandably exhausted by marketing claims. Our goal is to replace that scepticism with curiosity—while building long-term credibility through proof, not promises.
Beyond the external impact, the rebrand has also been important internally. It has helped bring the team together and build pride in the brand they represent every day. While we’ve focused on these five shifts, we’ve been careful not to lose sight of the people behind the science.

Image courtesy by Arevo
How many people are working on the rebrand process and is it done internally? Can you tell us about that process, and whether it was handled internally or with external partners?
We’re a small company—around 20 people in total—and within marketing, I’m a solo CMO. I don’t have an internal team, but I work closely with trusted consultants and partners. For this project, we partnered with an agency I had worked with previously, and based on that experience, I knew they would deliver. We started working together in July 2025, shortly after I joined Arevo in May.
Because we’re small, we involved the entire team in the process. Management was closely involved, but it was equally important for us to bring the wider team along the journey. Before building any brand strategy, we conducted internal questionnaires, surveys, and interviews to gather perspectives across the company. We also spent time understanding the competitive landscape and ensuring board alignment from the beginning.
One key principle for us was getting the strategy right before moving into visuals. Too often, rebranding starts with colours or logos. We deliberately took the opposite approach—writing the brand in words before expressing it visually. The first couple of months were dedicated almost entirely to research and analysis. We even commissioned independent research among our target customers to validate our thinking.
This groundwork ensured that when we moved into visual identity, everyone understood the strategy behind it. That made conversations about colours, design, and expression far more constructive. In many ways, this was the biggest difference compared to typical brand efforts.
There’s a common perception that rebranding is just about changing a logo or colour palette. In reality, most of the work happens before anything visual is created. It’s research, alignment, internal communication, and making sure investors, owners, and leadership truly understand what the brand stands for. It’s not the glamorous part of branding—but it’s what makes the work meaningful and sustainable.

Image courtesy by Arevo
What were the biggest challenges in evolving the brand alongside a science-driven product?
One of the biggest challenges was that Arevo had been operating quietly for nearly ten years. The team has a very humble personality, which isn’t a weakness—but evolving the brand meant becoming more bold and confident. That required embracing discomfort.
A clear example was the decision to make red a primary brand colour. Red comes directly from our seed-coating product, so we wanted to bring the product itself into the brand. Previously, we used green, which is common in this industry. When we analysed thousands of competing brands, we realised most of them relied on the same palette—green, brown, blue, orange. We wanted to avoid blending in.
Not everyone was immediately comfortable with that choice. Some in the management team felt the red was too strong, and we explored softer alternatives. But close to launch, it became clear that diluting the colour would defeat the purpose. We had invested too much time and thought into the brand to end up looking like everyone else. In the end, we committed to the original red—and once everything came together, it simply worked.
That experience reinforced an important lesson: as a marketer, you have to stand up for your competence. Everyone will have an opinion, but you’re hired to bring a perspective others don’t have—and you need the confidence to trust it.

Image courtesy by Arevo
We launched the new brand alongside our Arginex product line at a major industry event in Barcelona, and the response exceeded expectations. Media attention was unusually strong, with more than 20 key outlets covering the launch. As our CEO later put it, we were “the punk rockers of the industry”—exactly the shift we had hoped to make. People came to our booth out of curiosity, asking what we do and why we’re different. We’re also starting to see more inbound leads as a result, with some coming directly from the Arginex launch.
That curiosity is crucial. Farmers are tired of slogans and promises. When curiosity opens the door, we can talk about what really matters: science, proof, and data. This isn’t marketing language—it’s evidence.
Another challenge was how to visually represent science. We didn’t want to rely on purely AI-generated imagery that looks impressive but isn’t real. At the same time, studio professional images are expensive to produce and scale. Stock photos are boring. The solution was to combine real trial photography with more expressive, trained AI visuals—finding a balance between scientific accuracy and clarity.
In the end, evolving the brand alongside a science-driven product meant constantly navigating that balance: staying bold without oversimplifying, and communicating complexity without losing clarity.
Image courtesy by Arevo

Image courtesy by Arevo
Is there a particular meaning behind the logo, and what does it represent for Arevo today?
The previous logo was based on forestry seedling cartridges used in nurseries—containers with multiple holes where young plants are grown. That reference made sense given Arevo’s forestry roots, but over time it no longer reflected the broader idea behind the brand.
Today, Arevo’s brand idea is “root change.” The belief is that if you want to create real change in agriculture, it has to start at the root—not at the surface. Otherwise, it’s just a temporary fix. The new logo reflects that shift, focusing more clearly on roots and systemic change.
The iconic “A” in the logo carries multiple meanings. It stands for Arevo, for arginine—the core ingredient in the product—and for Arginex, the platform used to support multiple use cases. Visually, the form also suggests roots growing downward, reinforcing the idea of building change from the ground up.
Overall, the logo represents Arevo’s ambition to transform agriculture at a systemic level—by addressing root causes rather than surface symptoms.
Sustainability is a crowded space. What does Arevo believe it does fundamentally differently from other plant nutrition solutions?
Science is central to how Arevo approaches sustainability. That’s why our brand looks more like a technology company than a traditional agriculture brand—we operate in biotech, and our products are developed through rigorous scientific research, not trial-and-error mixing.
One key difference is that our product contains no living organisms. Many sustainable or organic solutions rely on microbes or bacteria, which can be unstable and behave unpredictably in different soils. Our product is non-living—it’s a molecule. Specifically, it’s arginine phosphate, which allows us to produce it with consistency and confidence, knowing every molecule performs the same way.
Another major distinction is focus. Many products on the market use blends of amino acids, assuming that more ingredients mean better results. We deliberately chose the opposite approach. We use one amino acid—arginine—because it contains the highest nitrogen content and has been scientifically proven to deliver the effect we’re targeting. While blends are cheaper and easier to produce, they don’t always provide clarity or consistent outcomes.
This clarity is what we aim to communicate. When people ask why we’re different, the answer isn’t branding or promises—it’s science. We don’t rely on slogans. We rely on proof, data, and years of rigorous research behind a single, well-defined solution.

Image courtesy by Arevo

Image courtesy by Arevo
What advice would you give to other science-driven companies about when—and why—to invest in brand clarity?
Most people don’t have the time—or the patience—to fully understand complex science. If it’s too complicated from the start, they won’t engage at all.
That’s why science-driven companies shouldn’t be afraid to dig deep into how their product really works and use that understanding as the DNA of the brand. The key is sequencing: first, capture attention; then earn trust by explaining the science in more depth.
This doesn’t mean avoiding science. It means making the first impression simple and clear, so people become curious enough to ask more questions. Once that curiosity is there, you can spend time explaining the details and the rigor behind the work.
Many science-led companies struggle to translate research into business language. Brand clarity helps bridge that gap—turning complex ideas into something people can understand, trust, and act on.
